|
 Has the Blair Government used it's greatest minds to create a time machine similar to the Tardis to go back in time? Have they then used this ability to increase the deployment of troops in Iraq by taking soldiers from World War One through a wormhole? That's the claim of a former Army General.
Former Army General Pencarreg says he quit the military when he says "the government went too far" He accuses the current Labour government of going back in time to take soldiers from the past Pencarreg says he heard Tony got the idea whilst watching an episode of the new Doctor Who. He put a top secret department from British Aerospace on the case to create a method of time travel advantageous to the government's policy and the British Military. The initial thought was to create the ability for the current army to briefly go back in time to correct mistakes just made. It appeared that wasn't viable. What was possible, was to go back in time to collect extra recruitments from the past.  It is confirmed by Pencarreg that Blair boffins invented time travel and went back to 1916. They transported soldiers going over the top in the battle of the Somme to a warehouse in modern day Romford. From there they were transported secretly to Iraq to fight on the front lines against terrorism. Nicknamed The Tally Ho Squad, they have been fighting in Iraq for two months. The advantage for the government is two fold, firstly they have increased numbers and secondly, any casualties will not be reported. Stuart Malvern, 94, a retired Lance-Bombardier said "The Prime Minister has gone too far in his space-time continuum meddling. No wonder going over the top didn't work in The Great War, seeing as Blair was transporting them through a worm hole to 2007 to save his arse in Iraq. What about all of us in 1916? Maybe we could have won earlier and saved countless lives, maybe that's why the tactics of mass forward movement against gun fire didn't work"
 Malvern's comments have sparked a huge debate over the military tactics of world war one. Defenders of Field Marshall Lord Douglas Haig and his "idiotic advance" tactics state that maybe Haig's tactics would have worked if not for the current PM's future interfering. Douglas Haig was known as the "Butcher of the Somme". History dictates he ignored the reality of the new form of modern warfare and showed callous disregard for the lives of his soldiers. Yet, Haig's defenders argue that Haig was an adaptive in his use of modern tactics and weapons. They claim Haig's critics - who remain obsessed with the tank and the machine gun - fail to understand that throughout World War I, battles were dominated by the artillery and the struggle to coordinate infantry and artillery attacks. They also claim, that although his tactics seem naive by modern standards, they were in fact state of the art for the time and probably would have worked better if not for the future government's timeline distorting actions. This groundswell of opinion from Haig supporters and widows of WWI victims have made a huge impact.
Nevertheless, most historians don't believe such "worm hole losses" could defend Haig's policy. Dr. Quinton Shropshire, a doctor of military science states the historical viewpoint of Haig still remains. You can not discount his ignorance of the new era of modern warfare, or his callous disregard for the lives of his soldiers. And although, he faced enormous problems, notably the inexperience of young soldiers and armies, the lack of effective battlefield communication and the application of new technology, these can't overshadow his niave tactics for fighting. His tactics were poor, and his go over the trenches and just run at the artillery tactics were ridiculous." Luckily for the current government and Prime Minister Blair is that the debate over 1916's tactics and the relevance of an over the top wormhole affecting the success of Lord Haig's tactics have overshadowed any such backlash to the whole Blair time manipulation policy. |
